• About Us
  • Our Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Multimedia
  • Publications
    • Policy Notes
    • Think Pieces
    • Expert Opinions
  • News & Events
  • Work With Us
  • Contact Us
iLEAD iLEAD iLEAD iLEAD
  • About Us
  • Our Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Multimedia
  • Publications
    • Policy Notes
    • Think Pieces
    • Expert Opinions
  • News & Events
  • Work With Us
  • Contact Us

Depriving the populist fire of its oxygen: Listening to the Philippine populist publics

April 2, 2019 Think Pieces

By: Cleve Arguelles


In Rodrigo Duterte’s Philippines, fears of further democratic backsliding have dominated conversations among democracy advocates. To counter this backslide, civil society groups and democrats are experimenting with strategies on responding to a populist president who has openly attacked human rights norms and democratic institutions. Some are considering convicting Duterte in national and international courts, others are flirting with the idea of impeachment or another extra-constitutional people power revolt, and many more are eyeing electing opposition politicians in the 2019 midterm elections. Regardless of the strategy being considered, the consensus is there is a need to counter the threats of Duterte’s rule to Philippine democracy.

However, with Duterte’s enduring popularity with his supporters and the populist publics continuously seduced by undemocratic alternatives, ensuring that democracy is still the “only game in town” in the Philippines requires work beyond forming broad and strategic anti-populist, pro-democracy and rights coalition among politicians and parties or seeking international and national legal remedy. In this report, I argue that depriving the populist fire of its oxygen entails appealing to its own supporter base. The work required then of democracy advocates is to grasp the causes of popular discontent and to counter democratic erosion in a way that the populist publics can embrace. In short, there is a need to listen to the populist publics so democracy and human rights advocates can win their hearts and minds. This report summarizes a study that responded to this particular need.

Drawing from deep conversations with many of Duterte’s supporters in big slum communities in the cities of Caloocan, Manila, and Quezon for several months, this report makes three key contributions to our current thinking on how best we can respond to populist threats to Philippine democracy:

  1. What explains Duterte’s enduring popularity among his supporters even for those who come from communities victimized by the president’s war on drugs is his capacity to make visible, give voice, and effectively respond to the conditions of everyday misery long experienced by the populist publics. The populist publics see the war on drugs as providing temporary but much needed relief in their communities.
  2. Yet the support for the war on drugs is also increasingly becoming fragile. The populist publics themselves have started to express doubts on the effectiveness of the anti-drug campaign due to its negative impacts on their community relationships and its selective and biased targeting against the poor. However, while this speaks to their disappointment on the war on drugs, the admiration for the president remains.
  3. The disappointment with the war on drugs may serve as an opportunity for democracy and human rights advocates to appeal to Duterte’s supporters. However, their current initiatives do not resonate well with the populist publics because of its shortcomings in responding to their conditions and motivations. The report offers several lessons, drawn from conversations with them, on how best to engage them and make them embrace the democracy and human rights projects.

In this report, these three points are discussed comprehensively including the details of the methods, theoretical orientations, and other aspects of the study. This report also builds from previously published ILEAD “expert analysis” pieces that are also drawn from the findings of the study.

Download full paper here.

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print

About the author

Cleve Arguelles

He is a political scientist who has lectured widely on populism, political participation and democracy at home and abroad including Universität Wien, National University of Singapore, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. He is Assistant Professor and Chair of the Political Science Program at the Manila campus of the University of the Philippines. His research on the populist publics was awarded the best MA thesis in political science at the Central European University in Budapest. One of his most recent publications is his chapter in the recently released A Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte’s Presidency (Ateneo De Manila University Press & Cornell University Press 2017).

  • Cleve Arguelles
    #molongui-disabled-link
    In Payatas under Tokhang, Community Relations are Weaponized
  • Cleve Arguelles
    #molongui-disabled-link
    “We hate the killings, We love the war on drugs”:
    Rodrigo Duterte’s Enduring Political Strength in Manila Slum
  • Cleve Arguelles
    #molongui-disabled-link
    Engaging Duterte’s supporters: Lessons from Listening to the Populist Publics
Tags: democracypopulism

You also might be interested in

From Crisis to Governance

From Crisis to Governance

Nov 16, 2017

Upcoming Event: Kapihan sa SWS with Czarina Medina-Guce

Upcoming Event: Kapihan sa SWS with Czarina Medina-Guce

May 22, 2018

“We hate the killings, We love the war on drugs”:<br> Rodrigo Duterte’s Enduring Political Strength in Manila Slum

“We hate the killings, We love the war on drugs”:
Rodrigo Duterte’s Enduring Political Strength in Manila Slum

Sep 3, 2018

Receive updates and our latest releases. SIGN UP

About Us

The Institute for Leadership, Empowerment, and Democracy (iLEAD) is a non-stock, non-profit think tank consultancy and resource center that focuses on strategic policy work to strengthen democratic institutions, in areas such as fiscal astuteness, meaningful devolution, and empowerment and protection of civic spaces.

Find Us

  • Unit 604 FSS Building II, No. 18 Scout Tuazon corner Scout Castor, Barangay Laging Handa, Quezon City
  • (02) 374-1580
  • ileadhq@ilead.ph

TOPICS

#thegovernmentwewant drug war jobs corruption accountability crisis governance rule of law People Power Open Research media civic space Open Data 1987 Constitution charter change federalism national budget human rights governance youth Sustainable Development Goals InnovateGov anti-illegal drugs campaign populism democratic backsliding democracy

Search

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

FOLLOW US

© 2021 · ilead.ph